Tag: Policy

Endangered Species Act: A Barrier to Progress?

The endangered Species Act, is the legal framework, which environmental groups rely upon to delay or completely block, many human favoring commercialization projects. This law taught as scientific fact to most grade school children, is based upon the premise that nature’s environment is a fragile, unadaptive process, which must be protected from unwanted human intervention. It matters not that this premise is inconsistent with the liberal sacred truth of “evolution”. Roll over Charles Darwin! The left advances this new tenet to its doomsday religious cult, Biome fragility and food chain stasis! Adaptation is the real myth, they contend!

Suppose that sacred “mother earth” will survive without this 1970’s vintage artificial construct foisted upon us and dressed in legal prose with supposed noble intentions!

Suppose sacred ancient greek mother god Gaia is an idol, worshipped only by foolish global elite liberals? Itself an accepted, but now nationally adopted, state religion.

Is this a thinly veiled constitutional work around by the non Christian liberal left?This could be a true state established religion promoted by environmental activists.

What would happen, if this idol worship was eliminated? Our nation and the world would survive and advance through human ingenuity. Of course as in all of human history, the pendulum may swing too far, paving the way for the liberal elites’s next resurgence, but the World would survive! Humans make mistakes as with this monstrosity, but humans and our planet will survive.

Fragility is a human construct, born of timid decision makers afraid of their position in society. It is 1070’s policy and is incompatible with the liberal view of how the species advance!

Real decision makers understand that knowledge is a journey, yet to be completed not the current consensus of supposed scientific experts. Yes, some errors will be made and my seem insurmountable or difficult to bear, but so is the dearth of human innovation and liberal elitist religious fervor contained in this act. Imagine all the inventions not proffered because their implementation would be too difficult and blocked by activist judges. Where could we be absent these Activist handcuffs?

So, I recommend allowing more decisions be made by market forces. Our environmental biome simply isn’t frail! The earth has survived even the terrible decisions of the past. Fragility is an unsupported new concept, even contrary to the liberal global elites’ views on “ evolution “.
It’s time to remove the social governor imposed upon human innovation by adoption of global fragility! This isn’t advocation of “ trashing our environment “, rather removal of innovation killing judicially imposed environmental fragility. Time to rethink the endangered species act. Toss out that 70’s documentary “ The China Syndrome! Time to trust that humanity will act in innovative ways and find solutions to problems both created and inherited! If error is made, it can be corrected!


Perhaps more “ turtle preservation methods” are needed? Will there be insufficient “ turtle advocates”? Perhaps because of human short sightedness. Perhaps because turtle adaptations will provide for survival or perhaps the answer is extinction? Both are “ natural “ processes in the liberal religion. Yet the stalwart liberal knows better! He can see all potential outcomes!

so, I contend the endangered species act ought to gain its historical place upon the “trash pit” along with its 70’s counterpart, the now famous documentary of the left “ the China syndrome”.

If you don’t want your personal data used in a way you don’t like, then do not post it on any site. If you don’t like a social media site’s privacy policies,then don’t use that site or better yet,band with others and create your own site. Don’t invite the government to regulate! Do not surrender any more of your choices for a false sense of security!

Control your social media information yourself. Don’t be lazy and invite the federal government to limit your choices

 

Watching any cable or network news broadcast is like entering an echo chamber! There are no serious opposition views presented. All views expressed merely echo a given channel’s right or left leaning establishment view.

This means you hear on right leaning broadcasts, lip service given to limited government and capitalism.  Eventually though, all commentary suggests the need for the federal government to save us from ourselves. They say there is a need for a national plan.(this sounds more like a cold war Soviet idea. ie a 5 year plan rather than a chaos driven capitalist economic model) Left leaning channels are more straight forward in their criticisms. The government is the citizen’s only hope! Nineteen Eighty Four is not just a novel on left leading broadcasts, it is a mantra, intended to be a way of life, which is repeated ad nauseum.

Conservative or right leaning consumers of news are busy and use their busy life schedules, as a reason to surrender their choices to an all consuming government.

Remember democracy is a form of government that can be tyrannical the same as a dictatorship. Just because a majority of individuals decide something by a popular vote does not mean you should always be required to abide by their collective will. This is why we have a limited federal government and a bill of rights.  It is to insure individual liberty.

Our Founding Fathers rebelled against a king, but recognized any government could act as a despot and threaten the individual. We have a bill of rights and a federal government of limited authority.  (Gee. the Revolutionary War was fought by armed colonists, maybe the second amendment is intended as a deterrent to run away rule of any kind including majority collective rule.) This should not be seen as threat of violence, but a statement of historic fact.  Power to rule is given to government by the people, but it is limited by God given rights, which no government can confiscate and no majority vote can negate.

We now are on the verge of surrendering our most basic rights because we are too busy or because we need to be nurtured and protected from a brutal reality. Reality remains brutal, whether you seek to hide in a false perception of safety under the protection of a  what you believe to be a benign government.  There are regardless many across the world willing to hurt or kill to possess just a small portion of what Americans take for granted.

There are many “good people” and their are many “bad people” in the world, but most are people just busy working and living boring everyday existences. Choice including economic choice is a freedom. It separates us from those forced by a collective mentality to live in a group or despot defined way.

Can you imagine a society where you are told what job to do.  Many say this would be great! Everyone working- No more unemployment- Guaranteed income! A more sensitive environment! What is the cost? Loss of personal choice? Loss of Religious freedom and free speech? Limited new economic and personal initiatives?

Please remember, there is always an expert that can tell you how to live your life better.  When their predictions are checked against the actual reality, most are miserable prognosticators.  We live in a connected and competitive world.  We must continue to grow our economy to stay ahead or risk losing our world position and high standard of living.

Why not have the most popular current view direct (compel/force)you to live in the best known way. Doesn’t sound quite so friendly when presented as a command does it?  Remember government is the use of force. Doubt me? Try not paying your taxes or violate an EPA property regulation or run a business and forget a required federal filing. Try to serve in a government job or a closed private sector shop without union membership.

Government rules by force, whether you agree with the rules or not, you must understand this fact.

This is why government must be limited!

So when you hear “we need the government to protect us from adds, on social media,or to protect our posted private data or protect us from “fake news”, remember you are moving closer to life as portrayed in the novel”1984″.  You also may limit economic and personal growth. ie wealth and job growth (Witness the limitations placed on television and radio by the FCC. The result: you have television and radio channels that still must include announcements  that limit the format of their programming even though technology has rendered these announcements obsolete.)

Congress passes bills then moves on seldom or sometimes never reviewing any law’s effectiveness.  When laws are reviewed, the review is conducted as througha prism that prioritizes maintaining the existing economic hierarchy and existing players and not based upon how well the laws assist in the growth of our wealth.

So I contend in any environment “Less is more and Less government is better government”

Federal power was limited to protect the individual and insure choice. Democracies are not immune to the use of excessive force on its citizens.  Beware the next time you hear

“There ought to be a law!”

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨