Playing with statistics and sound bites to secure your program or project!

Consult the latest poll. A poll is only a snapshot in time. Sometimes polls render relevant snapshots that can provide true voter insights. Others are simply fodder for an 24/7 news media in need of the latest irrelevant story. Polls at this time are relevant only to the talking heads seeking a seemingly relevant storyline.

Everyone plays the game the same, but it’s simpler, when your proposing new program spending that has some human suffering attached as visible proof of the existence of human need. You only have to disguise the level of need so that if it is a small group and could be addressed by a charity or possibly the proposal will not be a good expenditure, it still has victims. So , if it can save but one life, approve it. It’s also easy to attach favorable expectations to the would be nominee.
If a problem is too small, only state the national number of instances. Remember the mantra, if it saves a single life, possibly, you must approve. Of course with a program there will still be unreached, simply don’t ever mention that number.-A country of 330 million will have a large number of instances of any perceived problem. No where near the largest total of fatalities or victimization found in other circumstances but a large number because we are a large country. (Witness Covid fatalities and Biden’s use of numbers).

Since we all adopted government as our salvation, we have actively sought government solutions to almost all societal issues! Many suburban Republicans ( especially suburban Republican women)will rally their support for any problem solving program because someone is in need somewhere within our country and we are so rich, there can be no need! It’s not fair! Never use cost benefit analysis, always let emotions dictate policy. ( Never let available victims go to waste)( This is the mantra of government salvation syndrome

So if a critical thinker, always ask for the percentage affected by the problem. Can an existing charity or non government group effectively manage the problem? Is there even a real need or will to have a program for this perceived problem? Ask what percentage of the problem will remain post legislation? If the answer to either question is extremely small percentage or if others could handle, there is no need for government solution.

Gun control is a great example of this situation at play in the real world. No one believes we can physically remove even most guns.

Gun laws simply don’t solve the violence problem! There will always be a non compliant or “loose” neighboring jurisdiction say the proponents. ( witness the city of Chicago). Sometimes free people may choose badly and terrible consequences can result.

Bad choices will be made even with strict gun legislation. Is the loss of freedom or inconvenience ( cost ) worth the cost? Then ask the would proposed “ common sense gun laws” have stopped any mass shootings? Are gun control states less violent? Are existing laws even enforced. Will existing guns simply go away? Jot down your answer. Then decide. Remove your emotional bias!

Journalism will not return until reporters supply the who, what, where and when. Why and how are supplied by the reader only!

When I was a youngster (long long ago ) I went to college.  “Yes,   I even graduated with a BA then on to get a law degree at night”.  one class I explored as a undergrad was journalism. Even back in the Stone Age, there was too much homogeneity in network reporting. We in our class monitored national broadcasts.

There was a difference. How was there a difference and more importantly why! Homogeneity in network reporting in my day occurred because reporters as well as news editors shared a common filter. Everyone views the world through their own filters.( common life experiences translated similarly)There were checks on opinions. Opinions were for the opinion page, not news!  News answered the questions, who, what , where and when. Why and how were supplied by the reader after critical thought!

The educational schools in the 1970’s decided that education was about physical/ behavioral differences, and abandoned all checks on journalistic reporting. So, we hire based upon skin tones and sexual preferences and of course gender. ( Back when we thought we could tell. )

Additionally, enter the “New Liberal Elite”. Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton. Michelle told us everyone should go to college! How Sociiety produces needed goods and services is tomorrow’s question .

They extended the definition of diversity to cover only those, who accepted the “new world views”. Among these enlightened liberals were militant feminists. These individuals not only believed in female equality , though not true equality, but sameness of outcome for all.
Utilizing Clintonian equality, only 4+ 0 = 4.  Females are bumpy boys in search of their place in society. Transgenders are victims!  Most blacks lack fathers in their home and are economically disadvantaged leading to an  indefinite period of universal black subservience.

This new order led to a predominantly new era in the female educational establishment. Education changed to emphasis on only memorization.  Since all believed in equality of outcome, there was no need for critical thought. Any deviation was educational heresy!

News was easily reduced to one sided sound bites. Why question? There can be only one answer.  These soundbites were perpetually repeated without regard for the who, what where and when they were based upon.

Why the deviation in an article about news? Understanding where we are requires understanding how we got there.  The movement was incremental.  It required the public’s buy in on each step! We blindly accepted!  Led by suburban republican women and a beaten down Beta Republican who male population.

It’s time to return news to asking, who what, where and when. Time for push back against lies perpetrated by news media. Who was killed on Jan 6? What were the causes of death. When did they die? Democrats have an answer that includes a stroke victim.Republicans say two. Both members of ”the mob”. We should know answers to these and other questions.

I’m Liberal! If I don’t like your views, I just call you names and don’t Engage you, then erase you!

Have you ever shared a traditional view of the world, the economy, small government? If you have you have faced the Democratic liberal mob. These folks follow the current left wing “expert “. You are not allowed to voice disagreement with the expert’s views.
You accept or face erasure from validity. If you live in an area, your very livelihood can be threatened by venturing a viewpoint contrary to the current urban mobacracy.

Enter one brave or naive NFL Kicker. He dared speak his opinion, which runs afoul of over 50 years of liberal secular school teachings. His speech was at Benedictine College, a smaller Catholic College. He dared challenge the feminine role hierarchy.
Actually, hear what he said here. https://youtu.be/-JS7RIKSaCc?si=N40s8o7TLS7HjcBD

Since hearing Mr. Butker’s speech, I have witnessed the flocking of the feminist liberal carrion. First they mischaracterize his remarks as “anti woman”a sin. The role he spoke of was that of a traditional female homemaker and mother, wife. His views challenged the liberal role which all women must conform to. Live like men they implore! After all you are essentially no more than bumpy men given a bad lot in life by the vile patriarchy. Failure to conform demonstrates misogyny and limits all women in the modern society. How this occurs, when 47% of the population is male is another mystery. As is why men fail to defend themselves and women’s traditional role, remains a mystery.

After all to be a good modern society member, we must believe in overpopulation and minimize the reproductive role of women in child rearing in this society. Hail Thomas Malthus! Bring on your “brave new world.” How do we expand the use of the “Malthusian belts” and raise awareness of excessive population growth! “Down with all that stand in our path.” Better they not be heard. Tolerance is only a worn talking point or Sunday school principle! This is the “real world”. Spoiler alert! Malthus was wrong! Human ingenuity exceeded his understanding.

For those, who preach overpopulation and climate change, I encourage you to read: “Superforecasting”. This book looks at human future forecasting and emphasizes that continuous revision is essential to accurate predictions. A model therefore requires continuous updating as circumstances change. Liberals have continued to eschew the same narrative since Malthus and global warming!

Expert, Thomas Robert Malthus died in 1834. The starvation he prognosticated never came to fruition! Many say it was staved off by economic growth brought on by land discovery and free enterprise economics! Liberals insist starvation was confined to the third world by colonialism. It is in vogue to berate the traditional woman’s role in reproduction as female limiting because they are multitaskers, who can do so much more! After all every 100 lbs young woman can take down any man. Natural anatomy be damned. Never let science interfere with the liberal narrative!

Mr. Butker did not say all women should stay in the kitchen, “ barefoot and perpetually pregnant. He said 2/3 of women saw their most fulfilling role as that of wife and mother. No modern workforce female would ever admit having such feelings, even in a generation, where feelings are all that matter to many liberal women. This is especially true since the feminist movement continues to denigrate the female traditional role, what they refer to as seeking an “Mrs degree”. They continue with their pejorative slur. You can witness their tantrums visibly displayed on social media platforms.

Our schools continue to side with anti family activists like BLM. BLM has recently dropped its anti nuclear family message from its website. It now started with Treyvon Martin. As a matter of fact, the entire wikipedia page has been rewritten, much as in the book “1984”. Contrary to previous beliefs, BLM apparently didn’t exist prior to Treyvon Martin. Much as in the book “1984”, our Modern culture responds to criticism by sanitizing that is which found offensive.

Harrison Butker spoke truth for many women and men in our society. No society member need step forward. Their actions betray thought! Many in our society are too afraid to say how they really feel. So, “Free Harrison from liberal condemnation”. A person should not have his livelihood threatened because he voiced a currently unpopular sentiment. Don’t let liberal “mobacracy” speak for you or limit or erase your thoughts! Freedom means even liberals must tolerate our non expert, ignorant, non-expert, traditional views.

Still I remain confident. If liberals don’t like your views, they will move heaven and earth to remove you, rather than tolerate your difference. Free Harrison! Stand for free speech. The liberal way is not the only way!